مبانی تفکیک جرایم قابل گذشت از جرایم غیر قابل گذشت با نگاهی به قانون کاهش مجازات حبس تعزیری

This article aims to examine the principles of distinguishing excusable from unforgivable crimes and analyze the impact of the law on reducing the penalty of imprisonment on Iran's criminal policy. The present study, with a descriptive-analytical approach, has examined the jurisprudential principles including pure human rights, pure human rights, the combination of human rights and human rights with the predominance of human rights or human rights, and legal and paralegal principles including consensual justice, the theory of criminal tolerance, the principle of minimal criminal law, the principle of decriminalization, the principle of harm, and pacifist criminology. The findings show that the distinction between excusable and unforgivable crimes is based on a balance between maintaining public order and respecting the rights of victims, and that jurisprudential principles and paralegal theories play an important role in guiding restorative and humane criminal policy. Also, the law on reducing the penalty of imprisonment has provided the basis for the development and strengthening of excusable crimes by emphasizing the minimization of criminal intervention and strengthening non-custodial alternatives. This study shows that combining jurisprudential, legal, and paralegal principles can provide effective solutions for promoting criminal justice, reducing judicial pressures, and developing a culture of peace and reconciliation in the Iranian penal system.